Letters
to the editor from this week's Chronicle:
Redneck Review
No. 76 10/3/2016
On occasion, a quick look at history blended with a bit of common sense
can shed much needed light on the current infatuation with socialism we
find in much of our country today!
Any researcher on the internet can find information about the early
attempts made in this country with an economic set up best called then
and now a COMMON STOREHOUSE system, based on common ownership of land.
First in Jamestown with its leader John Smith, 1607, and in Plymouth Colony
led by William Bradford, 1620, an agreement was reached by the Christian
folks there that all provisions would be put in a common store, and then
would be shared equally when needed by all members of the community.
In records kept by both men, it was noted that the system quickly resulted
in many of the people simply sitting back and relaxing while the more ambitious
worked hard to fill the common store. However, all were willing to take
what they needed when it became time to use the goods! Both experiments
ended in disaster, called the "Starving Time" in Jamestown, and both discovered
later that a different system allowing families to own their own land,
feed themselves, and sell excess they might produce, was more efficient!
Bluntly, as can be found in the Bible, it was decided "He who does not
work will not eat." A Google search: "Common store house - Prager U." gives
a good look at this history!
Thus it can be seen that a system which places the burden of production
on one group of people to be shared by others who have no part in the production
has not worked before, and will not work today! Common sense says this
is true! Human nature being what it is, who would not be tempted to live
off the effort of others if the situation presented itself? And is that
not exactly the current rage in both the U.S., and in the world today?
Income equality! Tax the producer! The more productive, as determined by
the income earned by meeting the needs of others, the more should the tax
be! And why not be generous? Why not everyone enjoy a standard of living
that is comfortable, and which equalizes the use of the earth's resources?
How can this be done? Well of course, by a very powerful and a very benevolent
government, run by individuals who promise all equal shares of the goods
produced by the most efficient few! Disastrous! Take another look at Venezuela
today!
And what about the MACRO economic theory mentioned last week? Essentially,
use all the national statistics available on unemployment, inflation, income
levels, to decide what government programs to use to create a more equitable
sharing of scarce resources! And the economics to be used to achieve these
results? Why Keynes of course! Use the power of government's fiscal policy
to borrow, spend, tax, make grants, regulate and control, and the FED's
monetary policy to regulate interest rates, create and loan money... all
designed to keep the economy on a steady improving pace, eliminating the
booms and busts which seem to accompany unregulated economies! Simple!
Just "Step on the gas" by making money more available and cheaper during
times of slow down and recession, and then "Apply the economic brakes"
when things get overheated and inflation threatens! Hey! Is the continually
surging stock market not a sign of easy money and near zero interest?
Does it work? History of the past says "NO!" And our current situation
says the same! Easy it is for the folks in charge to crank up an ailing
economy like we have had with "QE" creations of low interest money! Witness
our $19 trillion debt, and the FED's unwillingness to raise those rates!
Both history and common sense tells us it is politically disastrous both
to stop our deficit spending habit, and begin raising interest rates! Voters
will rebel!!
Jake Wren
To the Editor
Thank you to Wayne Wimer of Seattle, WA. for his lengthy serial account
of the various atrocities of the former leader of Libya, the extremely
evil and murderous Muammar Qaddafi who has eventually received his due
at the hands of his own people. It is a shame it took so long and
so many people died at the hands of this terrorist thug before he could
be stopped.
What is amazing is the lengths that Wayne went through to illustrate
what an evil person it was that Donald Trump, a real estate magnate, agreed
to rent property to back in 2009; and then, after government and
public outcry, Qaddafi backed off and didn’t use the property, Trump had
the audacity to not give him his money back!
Donald Trump is a real estate tycoon and by definition, makes his money
buying, selling, trading and leasing real estate—sometimes to the least
desirable people on the planet. This would be similar to an investment
broker accepting and investing monies from an arms dealer or a defense
attorney defending some scumbag such as a rapist, mass murderer or Gitmo
detainee. You may have to hold your nose sometimes but that is what
you do.
The intent of the letter, I assume, is an attempt to show Qaddafi as
the scum of the Earth (which he was) and assert that Donald Trump is no
better and therefore shouldn’t even be running for President, even to the
point of evoking Ronald Reagan’s name. Pretty risky for a liberal.
Personally, this business deal pales in comparison to the LONG litany
of deceit, lies, cover-ups and shenanigans Hillary Clinton is guilty of.
At the very least, she should have been indicted for the e-mail fiasco
and probably should be in prison. She probably will be if Trump gets
elected. I won’t be looking for the final pro-Clinton tally in King
County. I already know how that will go.
Denis Duman
Deplorable American
Dear Editor:
Sheriff Doug Giddings is a Constitutional Sheriff. If you don’t know
what that is, perhaps you should find out. Sheriff Giddings has been protecting
our Constitution Rights for the past 8 years. If you want to give up your
Rights, then vote for his opponent. Who by the way is on administrative
leave because the Honorable thing to do when running against your Sheriff
is to resign from your position. Evidently Mr. Martinez is not honorable.
And when Shelly Andrews made accusations against the Sheriff and his Deputies
in a letter to an Editor and then said she had no proof only meant that
she was spreading unfounded rumors. Shame on you Shelly Andrews.
As for me, I plan on voting for Sheriff Giddings this year and any
other years he plans on running because I like my Constitutional Rights
being protected by a Constitutional Sheriff.
Thank you
Patricia Menough
Elk City |
Home
Classified
Ads
Template Design by:
|